The history of Afghanistan has always been accompanied by insecurity, military occupation, intra-sectarian and religious differences, foreign interventions and poverty of the society, ...
Read More
The history of Afghanistan has always been accompanied by insecurity, military occupation, intra-sectarian and religious differences, foreign interventions and poverty of the society, which has turned this country into a field to protect the interests of foreign powers. Afghanistan's relationship with countries such as Russia, China and Iran has always been calculated in the foreign policy equations of American governments. The developments after the events of September 11 and the military occupation of Afghanistan in 2001 removed the Taliban from power, until in 2021, at the same time as the withdrawal of American troops and the fall of Afghan cities by the Taliban, power was given to them after two decades. The main question is how the US foreign policy approach to the rise of the New Taliban group can be explained. The current research, using the explanatory method according to the theory of neo-realism, seeks to test the hypothesis that the dominance of the new Taliban at the top of Afghanistan's power did not mean the complete withdrawal of America from that country, but simply due to various reasons such as concern about the growing power of China, heavy military expenses, the presence of regional powers. Like Russia, China and Iran, the failure to eradicate terrorism can be explained by differences of opinion with the Afghan government and compromise with the Taliban
Volume 5, Issue 18 , December 2021, , Pages 91-108
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the concept of freedom and its relationship with law in Kant's philosophy of ethics. In his philosophy of ethics, he uses freedom as the basis ...
Read More
The purpose of this article is to examine the concept of freedom and its relationship with law in Kant's philosophy of ethics. In his philosophy of ethics, he uses freedom as the basis of moral reasoning and believes that when man has free will, then morality is real and the law of morality is valid for all human beings. According to him, freedom does not mean the possibility of doing whatever one wants, because a person who wants the freedom to do anything is in fact a slave to his low self. Authority becomes the source of action and its cause only when it is in accordance with the moral law.In the present study, we intend to use a descriptive method to examine the relationship between freedom and moral law from the perspective of Immanuel Kant. Kant wants to show that morality is not just an abstract and formal system, but something that can be achieved and that man is in a position to make it a reality. The issue that inevitably arises is the issue of freedom and the possibility of freedom for human beings.
